Inner Undulations

Thoughts and ideas, firing neurons, idiotic rantings, and cries in the wilderness. Everybody's got an opinion.

Friday, March 25, 2005

Jack Dunphy's "What if They Called 9-1-1"

"Brian Nichols, the man accused of murdering four people in Atlanta earlier this month, will stand trial for those crimes sometime in the next year or two. Unless something extraordinary is revealed during his trial he very likely will be convicted and sentenced to death. If at some point during the appeals process he sustains an injury similar to that suffered by Terri Schiavo fifteen years ago, will our robed masters twiddle their thumbs just as impassively as he is rolled to the execution chamber? No, they will not. They will tell us that even a convicted mass-murderer is deserving of all the protections the law can provide, the protections now being denied to a helpless, innocent woman.

"By the time you read this Terri Schiavo may well be dead. Our sophisticated betters lecture us that due process has run its course and that this is what the law demands. If this is so, then Charles Dickens was right: The law is a ass."

— Jack Dunphy is an officer in the Los Angeles Police Department. "Jack Dunphy" is the author's nom de cyber. The opinions expressed are his own and almost certainly do not reflect those of the LAPD management.

http://www.nationalreview.com/dunphy/dunphy200503241103.asp


THINK ABOUT IT. We provide and demand more civil rights for mass murderers, serial killers, than we do for one innocent woman who cannot speak up for herself.

* * *


Eugenics?

eu·gen·ics
n. - "The study of hereditary improvement of the human race by controlled selective breeding."

This idea started with Darwin's concept of "survival of the fittest."

Are you one of the "fittest?"

Do the strong crush the weak? Or do the strong protect the weak?

In its furthest savage reaches of chaotic "religion," eugenics says if a child is born with Down Syndrome, it does not have the right to live, because it pollutes the gene pool, it ensures a future weakness in the race of mankind. If a child develops a disease, one that will affect it for the rest of its life, then it should not be supported. In short, only the strong should survive.

An "unnatural selection" among humans. Only the strong survive.

What if you are determined not to be among the strong? Will you vote for such a project? Should you die if you are a man and not over the height of six feet? Should you die if your body contains more than 12 percent body fat, because your genes could corrupt the strong gene pool of the future?

"How far you go in life depends on your being tender with the younger, compassionate with the aged, sympathetic with the striving, and tolerant with both the weak and the strong, because someday in life you will have been one or all of these."
— George Washington Carver

"Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally."
— Abraham Lincoln


Theresa Marie Schindler

“One who condones evil is just as guilty as the one who perpetrates it.”
— Martin Luther King, Jr.

Schiavo is a dirty word, and it's amazing to me that people refer to Terri as Terri Schiavo. "Schiavo" and "Sleazeball" are becoming synonymous, and should not be applied to a decent, innocent person, one who is undergoing torture, at this moment -- BY LAW.

I'm furious -- I feel impotent, helpless -- I can't stand the fact that I am powerless in helping a woman in need. A brutal Government self-righteously demands that an innocent, defenseless woman be STARVED to death, that she THIRST to death.

Has our country gone completely CRAZY? Have filthy pieces of propaganda such as "Farenheit 9/11" infected our world with such a killer virus of stupidity, inhumanity and sleazeball pessimism, that we purposely call "Good" by the word "Evil," while calling evil good? Shame on you if this is you -- shame on ME for allowing our world to get to this place of undiluted excrement.

How can any rational person with even a shred of humanity, even hint that they are okay with this? How could anyone say that this is a good thing? That it is the humane thing? That this is decent, good, humane, fair -- a decision about "dignity." The word "dignity" has been utterly destroyed.

If someone starved a dog to death, tied it down in a "bed" and refused it water? Any decent person would demand that that person be arrested, that they go to court, that they pay a fine, that they serve time in jail -- TO WAKE THEM UP! Hey, that's not nice! You don't treat a dog like that! It has feelings, it is an actual being that desires love, not torture. Don't treat a dog as if it were nothing more than a wilted carrot.

Hello? You are a person, that means you have certain responsibilities, whether or not you believe in God. If Star Trek is your religion, then you are even MORE responsible for the health and well-being of Terri Schindler, because if you believe that "man is all there is," then things don't look too promising for atheists right now. What if someone were to legalistically determine that anyone who does not believe in God is in a "persistent vegetative state?" Would you applaud the fact that a court was denying you water to drink, food to eat? What if the State determined that your children would be "better off" without food and water?

Wake up! Are we humans? Or are we cold, calculating machines? If one of our fellow machines breaks down, do we toss it on the scrap heap? Is Terri Schindler a machine?

Paid sheisters have lied about Terri's condition. Hired guns have shot their bullets at an innocent, helpless life. The "Michael Moorlocks" of the world claim she is in a persistent vegetative state, that someone in such a condition cannot track a person in the room with their eyes, that someone in such a state does not respond to sounds, to smells, or recognize voices, that if someone smiles in such a state it is an accident -- by this criteria, Terri Schindler is NOT in a persistent vegetative state. Wake up! Wake up now! Don't buy a lie just because a one-ton creep in the style of Michael Moore's version of reality perpetrates it (no matter the laugh track you stick to it, it is still a lie) -- would anyone condone tying down Michael Moore and starving HIM, this psuedo-intellectual who denies any sanctity to life?

If the "official Democrat" position is murder, can you ever call yourself a Democrat again? Think, ask yourself the hard questions -- what if it was ME? What if I could still think, but I could not express my thoughts verbally, what if when someone hurt me, it actually HURT me? You wouldn't like it if someone cut off your cable TV, let alone your water supply, your food.

This is not a line in the sand, dividing Democrats and Republicans.

It is a line in the sand delineating DECENT vs. INDECENT, INNOCENT vs. GUIILTY, CITIZEN vs. CRIMINAL. This is a wake-up call delivered to America, if it never received one before (does ANYone remember September 11? when self-righteous rat/human amalgamations cowardly attacked innocent people? do you remember how you felt when beings hardly even human anymore, made decisions to change the world for bloodshed, murder, chaos, mayhem? the same kind of murder-mayhem-mentality [or anti-mind] is doing perpetrating the same kind of vicious, inhuman crime upon an innocent woman named Theresa Marie Schindler! are we "okay" with it?).

Wake up, before it is too late. You would not do this to your loved one. You would not even do this to your enemy. And if you stay silent, you align yourself with the murderers in black robes, the legally blessed terrorists. The spirit of Saddam Hussein is alive and well, kicking it around here in the good ole U.S.A. -- reject it.

Terri Schindler deserves a certain quality of life -- she's not getting it. She deserves LIFE, period, just the same as you or I (and the legal system is full-bore attempting to deprive her of this BASIC RIGHT).

Say something -- if to no one else, talk to God about it. You still do know right from wrong, don't you? If you don't, then there is not much hope for humanity, is there?

Edmund Burke may or may not have said "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" -- regardless of where this maxim originated, we -- all of us, you, me, them, she and they and those guys over there -- we instantly recognize the truth of the sentiment. Another way to say it would be: "Well, some guys that I think are smarter than me accept this, so I probably can't go wrong by buying into it!" Wake up. Don't open your mouth when the big hand moves the toxic baby food closer and closer to your lips. Don't bite it. Don't chew it. Don't swallow. It is garbage, and it will kill you.

There is absolutely no logic or reason or humanity in removing food and water from a woman who has tragically suffered brain damage. That's the truth. We don't have to complicate it further than that. It's true, it's right, and if you don't like it, think about it, why not?

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them."
—Malcolm Forbes


Friday, February 11, 2005

Conspiracy Theories

This guy was huge, not exactly fat, not exactly muscular, but huge, in a strong and roly poly way. He came strolling down the aisle to the front of the church, with a big meaty red face, a bright red shirt, and spotless white dockers. He plunked down in the second or third row from the front, and sat there smiling, his smile almost filling his entire huge face.

My wife and I were sitting in the row behind him, but on the far side of the pew (he sat near the middle aisle, while we were on the outside left of the church, near the front). He glanced back directly at me and nodded and smiled with such a look that I though I must know him, or at least had met him sometime before, and it seemed he remembered me a lot more than I remembered him.

When the time came for everyone to get up and greet a few people, I walked straight over to him, and he turned immediately to meet me. This was odd for me, as I'm highly introverted, and generally people must come to me. But something compelled me to go to him, and he was ready. He grabbed my hand with his big beefy hand and our hands seemed the same size and strength. At the time I was about 36 or 37, and this big guy must have been about 55 or so, with a mop of very white hair and white eyebrows.

He started talking, to me what seemed impossibly fast. Some of the most rapid-fire speech I've ever heard. And yet, as I stood there with my head tilted, trying to listen and absorb as much as possible, it seemed I could clearly hear everything this guy was rattling off. And it wasn't the kind of stuff a stranger usually began to spew in church. It's all a blur now, but I met him after church and he gave me the same rapid-fire treatment, but at least allowed me to get in a few questions, which he'd answer in a machine-gun rattle of high-powered free-flow and free-form speech.

Here is an example of some of the stuff he said, and I'll do a one-byte paragraph -- this all crammed into about 30 seconds of time, in one huge breath -- but keep in mind, this guy didn't seem crazy (well, a lot of the stuff seemed crazy, and I do tend to draw the fringe thinkers and conspiracy nuts, but he seemed completely rational, like a third-grade school teacher telling a quick list of how his day goes, only you find he's telling you about a classroom of albino children with two heads each, all of them mindreaders, and these kids are going to take over the world -- is this guy a nut? Or a genius with a paradigm microscope that is picking up details on reality that you never thought plausible, let alone possible).

"It's all happening now, it's all clicking into place, everything, no one can see it right now but it is spinning out of control, all the key elements are snapping together and you can almost audibly feel it, it's all around you, the cell phone usage, that will continue to expand, rapidly, they'll want to get everyone in America on a cellphone, everyone, and Aspartame, sneaking Aspartame and other similar mind-control chemicals into everything you eat and drink, because the Coven is tightening their grip, they are moving forward now at an incredible pace because they know their time is short, and if you're not careful you will not see it happening, it will all seem normal including the laws that clench down on civilians as the Government takes more power for itself, as citizens lose all their rights to privacy or individual thought."

That's kind of a cumulation of the kind of stuff he was telling me. And he was telling me this stuff as lightly as if we were discussing the weather, he kept his voice low and personal, he met my eyes, eye-to-eye, and he didn't seem to need to look away or hardly breathe. And something, an overwhelming sensation of compulsion, told me to listen, listen carefully, take in as much as possible. Another part of me, of course, was screaming: "This guy is a nutcase, watch out!"

One of my traits is that I tend to talk on the slow side, mainly because my mind is going so fast it is difficult for my lips to keep pace, and if I talk any faster my tongue and lips will start clashing and tripping over each other -- unless I get upset, or angry, and then of course more instinct than mind takes control, and my speech can get very fast. This guy was completely calm, and the things he was saying, though they sounded ridiculous, were spoken in such a calm and rational way that it created an almost supernatural sense of drama.

I finally broke in and said: "So exactly what is this all doing, what does Aspartame and cell phones have to do with each other?"

"It's mind control, subtle mind control that no one notices, as both Aspartame and cell phones were designed specifically to create tumors, generally benign tumors, in the brain. I was a chemist working for the Government on this project, and we specifically tested chemicals to find a way to slowly, subtly replace healthy brain cells with useless matter, tumors, clusters of tumors, so that people will slowly begin to lose their ability to make decisions, to think clearly, to see behind the issues, to make rational decisions even on important issues, so that people will lean more and more upon others to make the necessary decisions for them."

He rattled out different chemical equations and combinations and alternative names for Aspartame and launched into a diatribe about the different waves and rays that are constantly ripping through the atmosphere, most of which I could never remember or distinguish fact from fantasy, but he was saying all this in an authoritative way, as if all this were true to him, and he needed to tell certain people.

In a period of about 10 minutes he told me that he was on the run, that he used to be wealthy, that a Coven was running America, and the world, that such people as Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw were high in the echelons of this Coven of Witchcraft, that the media was locked into this elite body, he mentioned the Illuminati, and that the media was feeding the civilian the "necessary" information.

After a while he thanked me for listening to him, shook my hand in his big paw, and then smiling, walked away.

On the drive home I jokingly told Carolena that maybe this guy was an angel! She thought he was just a crazy guy.

But in the ensuing years I've wondered, because when he told me this stuff about cell phones, I had never heard anything of the kind, but instinctively I knew to use them only in emergency situations, not as a chatting instrument. My body could feel the negative rays shooting into my head, very similar to standing in front of a microwave oven while it's running. I had already heard the negative side to Aspartame and had never desired to use THAT, just a small taste of it makes your body scream that this is worse than any caffeine or sugar. And cell phone usage has exploded -- there is a distinct push to convince everyone to abandon conventional phones, "git yer hole family on this inixpinsive plan, you kin talk a 1000 minutes a day!" And Aspartame, despite the obvious health dangers -- it is increasing, not decreasing.

This happened a few years before the movie "The Matrix" appeared at theaters, and when I first saw it, a lot of bells rang (bells related to this "crazy guy" and also to many other things). Reality is far different than what most people imagine.

Angel or crazy man?


Thursday, December 30, 2004

Moorlock Fleecing the Eloai

Jabba the Hutlike, Michael Moorlock oozes and exhudes, and the Eloai purr and coo. In cherished Jabbaspeak (imagine Jabba after inhaling helium), Michael Moorlock makes pronouncements and the Eloai nod their woolly heads, sagely.

"Baaa," they intone, answering Michael Moorlock's "Wubb wubba wub wub."

Interpretation into English:
Shame on you, Mr. President, for launching your fictional war, for your fictional reasons, with your fictional rhetoric, and fictional fictions. Lie, lie lie, LIE lie lie, LIE LIE lie lie, lie lie lie. Thank you very much, and thank you for the Oscar. Yippee!

The Eloai clap their hooves, they wag their woolly tails and nod their woolly heads. Amen, they say, hurrah and hallelujah.

Iraq, you say, linked to terrorism? Don't be absurd. Didn't you hear Sean Penn, he talked to the Iraqis and they love everybody, they feel that everybody's religion is just as valid as anyone else's, and everybody deserves an equal break, everybody deserves a big ole group hug. And poor misunderstood Saddamn Hussein, he only wanted to beautify his country, he wanted every Iraqi to get some time serving their country (the torture chamber gotta be cleaned, you know? all that stainless steel needs to be polished and hygenic) -- none of these good spiritual people wanted to get their collective ass kicked by the good ole U. S. of A.

So what if Saddamn Hussein sends bounties to the families of the exploding Palestinians, this isn't terrorism, it is only a humanitarian effort by the "great man." Link to terrorism? Absurd. Link to 9/11? I think we can all agree that Saddamn Hussein was not flying EVEN ONE of those lethal jets that punched into innocent American targets. How can those rightwing nutjobs even IMAGINE connecting Iraq to terrorism? Haven't they listened to the "Wubb wubba wub wub?" Don't they realize that 9/11 was a fictional day?

The Eloai flock together, they raise their right hooves, they chew the green grass. Baaaa, they agree.

And Michael Moorlock guffaws, he snatches a sweet Eloai and tosses it whole into his gullet. A guy has got to eat, don't he? And Michael Moorlock sells the truth, so for the greater good, for the collective conscience, what does it matter if an individual or two adds to his fat cell storehouse? Prophet, entertainer, salesman and poster boy for double supersize portions, Michael Moorlock, he wubbs, and the Eloai baaa. When the big ole tummy of Michael Moorlock grumbles, the Eloai ever prove sweet.



Wednesday, December 29, 2004

Aborted Reasoning

Think about it, the people that favor abortion, generally decry capitol punishment. So death to the innocent (generally soft-termed "right to choice") allows humans the right to end the life of a person that has never made a choice, but disallows humans the right to collectively put an end to someone who has chosen to end a life.

Does this make sense? It is okay to kill an innocent, but inhumane to kill the perpetrator guilty of a heinous crime.

Probably it all comes down to what is seen and what is not seen, what is little and what is big. A human fetus is very small, it hardly looks human, and it is unseen (hidden within a woman's body), whereas a mass murderer is comparatively big (in relation to a fetus) and is generally not hidden within a woman's body, and usually passes for human. So we cringe at terminating the life of a big person which appears human that we can see, but find it reasonable to end a human life because we cannot see it and it hardly appears human.

When does the fetus cease to be "part of a woman's body" or a "woman's choice?" Is it when it is separated from the host? So that a baby whose umbilical cord is severed is a human on its on right, no longer a piece of flesh sprouting from another person -- at this point it would be a crime to jab a scalpel into its head, correct?

Is this right? Does it make sense?

But when the baby's head has not crowned, it is not a person, and a sharp instrument that is inserted to find and destroy the baby, a penetration that rips and tears the infant brain mass, perforate the tiny beating heart, eradicate the fluttering bloodstream and process of cell production, ceasing all life functions -- this is nothing more than removing a tumor from a patient's body? Or liposuction? It's just fat, fluid, matter, no substance that any yuppy would affix a price tag. As long as the human being is hidden within another human being, it is not a human being, but part of the body which it is hidden within, isn't this the logic prevailing in our society today? It is not a baby, because it has uttered no discernible cries, nor has its tiny fingers gripped an adult's pinky finger, it has made no choices, consumed no products -- it's just not human. It is wet and disgusting and helpless.

(Of course, five minutes later, cleaned and sponged, screaming like the Dickens, it is recognizable as a human, and we can place diapers upon its lower half thus ensuring that it is now a consumer of our goods, and so of course this is a baby, don't be stupid!)

And yet a sociopath, someone who judges themselves to be "real" and other people outside their orbit to be mere inflatable objects -- when this sociopath goes on a wanton killing spree and ends the lives of ten to fifteen people and even boasts of his feat, comparing himself to other serial killers he has idolized -- we as human beings do not have the right to terminate this sociopath's life, correct? Isn't this the logic prevailing in our society today?

Isn't this Michael Moorlock Think?

But it's not a baby, the Eloai protest, it cannot live on its own, it is a mere parasite attached to an innocent host, it cannot be called human! And the sociopath? He's not guilty of his crimes because it is a callous society that has created him! Frankenstein's monster is not guilty because Doctor Frankenstein created it, so as a society we cannot punish Frankenstein's monster, but only shackle it and keep it from hurting future torch-wielding peasants.